1. US President Barack Obama visited Hirosima last May, 71 years after since the atomic bombing for the first time as a present president. This resulted in an outlook by experts that the visit may give a giant impact on the drift of the world diplomacy. Describe for each of the positive and negative impact that the state visit can have on diplomatic current.
In 1945, August, US decided to use atomic bombs. They were used twice, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Two atomic bombs made several hundreds of thousand people to death by these bombings. World War 2, wash finished and many colonies including Korea met independence.
71 years later, 2016, US president Barack Obama visited Hiroshima where US atomic bomb explode. After this bombing, no president had visited Hiroshima but Obama did as first. Many diplomatic experts predicted this visit has significant impact not only relationship between two countries, but also whole world diplomacy. It could have positive and negative impacts.
Two countries, Japan and US, had fought in World War 2, such as Philippines war. The result was these bombings. However those days, Japan and US are allies to each other, also Japan is significant country for US force’s strategy. For maintaining good relationship in the present, it would be good choice to remind and even apologizing each other for two countries’ history in World War 2, especially atomic bombing. This would be main positive impact for two countries.
Interestingly, the stronger alliance for Japan and US impacts other countries as well. First, it influences Korean peninsula’s situation, war between South and North, also China or Russia, which are evaluated as standing for North Korea could be influenced.
However, Barack Obama’s attitude in Hiroshima once made little anger for some Japanese. Some Japanese wanted ensure apologize from Obama, but he didn’t show the word ‘apologize’ or ‘sorry’. For this problem, I thought, not only Obama saying sorry for atomic bombing. Japan could say again sorry, apologize for started to fight with US, World War 2. Then it could be better scene and good scenario for two countries.
3. At the ‘2016 International Food Industry Exhibition’ robots or machines working in a food factory were exhibited. While the automation of food spreads out in the general restaurant, Robot “Pepper” of SoftBank is taking orders from some Asian Pizza Hut Branch and taking charge of payment. With the expansion of the use of artificial intelligence robot as a labor substitute, there are a variety of perspectives on it. Describe both the positive and negative impacts that the labor force of robots can trigger.
This winter,2016, Google challenged Korean famous ‘Go’ player ‘Lee Se-dol’ for the Go games with Google’s intelligence robot, ‘Alphago’. He permited the games, and he was in sure for winning. Howeverm he defeated 4 times and won only once. Consequence of this match made a big wave of intelligence. Normal people started to be interested to intelligence robot and even some people started to wonder that they could lose their jobs by intelligence robot.
And those days, many intelligence robots got the jobs ‘SoftBank’ let robot ‘Pepper’ for charge of payment. Someone are wondering as I mentioned before but others are expecting for additional effects from intelligence robots. By the way there are both positive and negative impacts that the labor force of robots can trigger.
First, for positive effects, we can expect fast and effective working for robots. The fact that robots, machines have some fields which can work better than humans is such in sure. It was proved in history, the ‘Industrial revolution’. Normal robots, machines without intelligence had few fields can work, but intelligence robots can work for various fields, every fields that humans have difficulties to work. This will trigger a lot and lot of financial benefits. There is another benefits that they can work all day, and 365 days a year. By contrast that human hass to rest. It also triggers more benefits.
However, it is true that there are negative points as some people’s wonder. A lot of jobs as many as intelligence robots get more and more people will lost their jobs. Example for SoftBank’s robot Pepper I mentioned, probably casher who worked for Pizza Hut lost job because of intelligence robot, Pepper. The intelligence robots are controversial because of these pros and cons. This topic should be had solution.