1. US President Barack Obama visited
Hirosima last May, 71 years after since the atomic bombing for the first time
as a present president. This resulted in an outlook by experts that the visit
may give a giant impact on the drift of the world diplomacy. Describe for each
of the positive and negative impact that the state visit can have on diplomatic
The president of the US, President Barack
Obama visiting Hiroshima can have by impacts to the international society. This
can be positive. On the other hand, it can be negative, too. I think the
positive effect of this visit is that it can be a reminder to the people of the
world has nuclear bombs can make many people die. And also, it can be a
negative effect too, by making people may think that criminals were right.
Predominantly, the positive effect of this
visit is that reminding the tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should never
happen again. When the second world war was ending, America decided to launch
the Manhattan project and make a nuclear bomb. Even though the US and USSR were
allies, they didn’t like each other because of their political systems. So,
Harry. S. Traman, the president at that time, decided to make a nuclear bomb
before USSR could. And that led to thousands of people dying in Japan. The
American President visiting Hiroshima can make nuclear weapon-possessing to think again about the usage of nuclear
Additionally, the negative effects is that
Japanese people can think that the war criminals were right. If they think like
that, they will think they should rise again like they did in the early 1940s.
Japan does have a strong army even though they were restricted to have a among
WWⅡ. If the idea of war rises and effects
politics there may be once more a big world war that even more people die.
In conclusion, the visit to Hiroshima by
President Barack Obama has both positive and negative effects. But still, I
strongly behave that nuclear bombs should not be used ever again.
At the ‘2016 International Food Industry Exhibition’ robots or machines working
in a food factory were exhibited. While the automation of food spreads out in
the general restaurant, Robot “Pepper” of SoftBank is taking orders from some Asian Pizza Hut
Branch and taking charge of payment. With the expansion of the use of
artificial intelligence robot as a labor substitute, there are a variety of perspectives
on it. Describe both the positive and negative impacts that the labor force of
robots can trigger.
Artificial intelligence, AI, is belong a
big issue these days. AI can trigger lots of social issues. AI, can do all
sorts of things. Labor go company manipulating AI can have lots of positive and
negative points. On the other hand, I think the most important positive point
is that works done by humans can be done much faster and efficiently. But also,
the negative point is that AI can take away human jobs.
First of all, the positive point of AI is
that it can do work most efficiently. For example, a highly advanced safer
computer can take care of huge means of information. 100 times of human
computers can calculate how the world’s economies current will flow, and make
new and great inventions. Recently, a robot named Alphago won a game of Baduk.
Alphago can be seen as the basic model of AI.
On the other hand, AI can take away human
jobs. AI will take away labors. For example, programmed industrial robots will
make cars. They will start to construct buildings. These hand labors are a job what most people do. Brain
labor is not safe, also. Huge supercomputers that can deal terabites of
information will be selected to manipulated companies they will think what
products can be sold more.
In conclusion, AI also influence human
society in a lot of ways. This can be either positive or be negative. But, on
my thought, I believe people should use this technology in a good way and not
use as something dangerous.